![]() Personally, I wish I'd not bought OLC South America and think OLC Africa is better, but that really is down to individual taste. A few areas such as the deserts, Nile Delta, certain mountains, I feel, are very believable for a landclass product. Landclass products lay out a grid which defines which type of texture tiles should be used in any particular grid square, terrain texture replacement products like FTX Global and GEX replace the default terrain texture graphics referenced by those maps with improved versions. OpenLC Africa is a landclass replacement for the African region which also includes some enhancements to mesh, a few buffed-up airports etc. There is no such thing as a worldwide landclass product called "Orbx Global LC." I think you're confusing the name of FTX Global, which is a texture replacement package, not landclass. I would say it is not as nice as South America, but a massive improvement compared to other solutions for Africa. ![]() The Ethiopian highlands look very nice with a mesh installed, and, together with a freeware HAAB, it captures the spirit of the landscape around Addis Ababa quite well (I have been there, so I can compare it to real life). ![]() The desert looks definitely better than ORBX Global LC (the edition for the entire world), but it is not photoreal and has some repetitive elements. I have concentrated on the region Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia, Eritrea so far. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |